.
Feedback

What do you fear?

Life is dangerous. Is fear a necessary part of our lives, or can we live with a reasonable expectation of safety?

Cantaloupes. I fear the stealthy, killer cantaloupes.

At a one-day session to discuss issues regarding Washington’s apex predators—wolves, grizzlies, black bears, and cougars—one of the warm-up introduction questions was “Have you ever feared for your life? Give a brief description.” The room had numerous biologists who spend their time in the woods, working in the territory of carnivores—animals that kill to eat. When my turn came around, I just volunteered that “I was a Naval Aviator and have 80 carrier-arrested landings at night in F-4 Phantoms.” For some reason, that was a satisfactory answer, probably better than mentioning cantaloupes. The most memorable story was from a biologist who was inching along a rock shelf when he met a bear coming the other way. Though neither spoke the other’s language, they quickly agreed that the bear had the right-of-way, and as the bio yielded by working his way back, the bear followed, encouraging the bio to keep moving. Once clear of the shelf, both went on their separate ways.

Fear regarding wildlife, or even night carrier traps, is interesting. Those who know wildlife respect the animals, but maintain “situational awareness,” awareness of their surroundings, awareness of likely encounter areas, and awareness of an animal’s body language, when sighted. The biologists know the probability of a dangerous encounter, though real, is low. Those who fear wildlife, generally have folk knowledge, if that.

Cougars—mountain lions—are my special interest. Sometimes called “The Cat of Cats,” cougars have an impressive combination of strength, agility, skill, and weapons. Yet, a healthy cat is unlikely to attack people in normal circumstances. In 120 years of record-keeping in the US and Canada, there have been about 200 attacks with cougar/human contact, 20 of them fatal. The attack rate of the past 25 years is higher than the previous 90, but still a minuscule risk, especially for a confident, aware person. Many biologists would tell us that growing human populations encroaching on wildlife habitat leads to increased interactions.

I have asked a handful of cougar experts, biologists who study them in the wild, why we fear cougars. Most relate it to our DNA, to the reptilian parts of our brain, or to our tail-bone. In other words, we fear because something once considered us as prey. The bios all agree, too, that fear is irrational regarding cougars. You see, cougars evolved independently of hominids; we do not fit their prey model. Leopards and tigers, conversely, did evolve with humans.

Statistically, there are many dangerous killers that we ignore, yet we fear the improbable killer. Family dogs kill more people in the US annually than cougars have killed in a century. Of course, we give dogs a better opportunity, all while saying “My Pookums would never hurt anyone.” The Center for Disease Control (CDC) tells us we’re wrong approximately 800,000 times a year about Pookums hurting someone, and our dogs send about 386,000 people a year to the Emergency Department. Still, we love our dogs, and rightfully so. Automobiles are another miscreant that we should fear more than wildlife, but we don’t.

Respect is the answer. Most of us respect our pets, and our automobiles, enough to learn about them, and to try not to drive them outside of their limits. The same holds true of night carrier landings: respect the danger, stay within the parameters. Fear leads to irrationality, and to bad decisions. The same applies when enjoying outdoor recreation. If you are going to be in areas with carnivores, elk, mountain goats or mountain sheep, take a canister of Bear Spray. It’s the best $50 you’ll ever spend on life insurance, and having it with you will remind you to maintain situational awareness. Your chances of needing Bear Spray, or using it, are small, but non-zero, so you will be secure knowing you are prepared.

Now, about those deadly cantaloupes. Cantaloupes from Colorado killed more people in 2011 than a century of human marauding by cougars and wolves in the US and Canada. Am I rational to shun them at the grocery store, to avoid the aisle that has those killers piled high? When I see a cantaloupe, should I call the Health Department, and insist they remove the cantaloupe, because of the danger it represents? Probably not. Danger from produce is small, though greater than zero. We take precautions. We can do the same with our wildlife. As we expand further into the wildlands, we will meet more wildlife, and we need to accept the minute, but non-zero risk of those encounters. No one can guarantee there won’t be another death from a cougar (1924 had the single death in WA), and no one can guarantee that cantaloupes won’t go on another killing spree. Don’t let the fear of the improbable destroy your enjoyment of cantaloupes, or of our wonderful outdoors.

Thoreau wrote “In wildness is the preservation of the world.” We owe it to our children and grandchildren to care for our wildlife and to leave them a legacy of wildness, a habitable world, and maybe even cantaloupes.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sammamish-Issaquah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sorting through clothing at the warehouse
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Thank you so much for sharing this great event on Patch! What a cool thing to do--as an IssaquahRead More resident, I really appreciate your involvement with EBC.
Photo by Jean Johnson
Susan Gerend May 18, 2013 at 07:58 am
We too, love having our Farmers' Market return! Opening day was a bit weather-challenged. ThankRead More you merchants for enduring the wet and cold for our new extended hours! What a wonderful sight will return to the plaza when the sunshine calls back all the families with happy, giggling children. Market day is a date of dinner out (side) & shopping (vegetables, fruits and now HedgeHog Toffee) with my husband. Doesn't get much better than that! SEE YOUR THERE! Susan Gerend
Margaret Santjer (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Thanks for posting that, Jean! I love this time of year when the markets open. Were there a lot ofRead More people for the opening day?
David V May 15, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Thx Kendall, bear news just isn't what it used to be. thinking it has something to do with the komoRead More anchor moving out of our trossachs neighborhood:)
Kendall Watson (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Hey, thanks for the bear photos on Friday! Sorry about the slight delay in posting!
Ben H April 14, 2013 at 03:42 am
Agreed Mark, Much as this solution seems crazy, some things are worth paying for (law and order, aRead More decent safety net, good schools and yes roads). I do blame the tax hawks though. Washington already has a relatively regressive tax structure. The "choke the government" solution seems carried way too far.
Question Mark April 12, 2013 at 02:13 pm
I thank the author for his well thought out arguments regarding these important transportationRead More issues in Washington state. While I believe some of the ideas presented are debatable, for example I believe that a vital and well used transit system ought to be part of our congestion relief plan in metropolitan areas, the lack of realistic funding options for this system cannot be ignored. However, our legislature (both parties included) seems to place a higher priority on "no new taxes" than creating a sustainable future for the state in many areas, including the transportation system. More than that, though, we live in a state whose citizens have varied interests and priorities. Most of all, we need our government to set priorities so that citizen interests and needs can be reasonably served. It seems we are pretending that we can base tax policies and tax rates exclusively on individual self-interest, as is often the consequence "no new taxes" scheme (e.g. if I don't get a direct benefit for myself, I won't support paying for it). This seems to me to be as much a part of this problem as current transportation system priorities.
Richard Bray April 9, 2013 at 07:26 pm
It gets worse folks. I was part of a selected focus group a few weeks ago of people who live alongRead More I-405 conducted by a well-known marketing research firm and paid for by WSDOT. They are considering options that would charge commuters to use a new lane on I-405 & charge for the existing carpool lane too (even if you have two people in the car!)