.
Feedback

Bringing Back the Priorities of Government Budget

Part 2 of a 2 part Series of I believe is needed to bring back economic prosperity to Washington.

Dear Friends,

Two weeks ago I posted the reason why a constitutional amendment is necessary to make the 2/3 majority permanent in Washington. The next step to stabilize the state budget is equally important; to bring back the Priorities of Government Budget (POG) model.

"It is not an arrogant government that chooses priorities, its an irresponsible

government that fails to choose."

                                                             -Tony Blair

There has been no discernable process for budgeting for the better part of a decade under the current balance of leadership. The OFM website says that the POG model is still utilized; however there is little evidence of it's practice. Leaders in Olympia have failed to identify priorities and then bring those into public view. Stabilizing the budget will allow for the private sector to plan for capital investments and decisions in hiring. More importantly, it creates a foundation for the discussion around what it means to fund education first. And finally, it will give the assurances to our citizens who rely on the safety net, that their needs will be predictably met.

The Will To Set Priorities, Not Labor On Complexities

The POG approach is effective because by inquiring about what results the citizens of Washington expect from our government. Then it considers the most effective strategies for achieving those results, how spending is prioritized, and then how progress will be measured. It attaches relevance to performance information as it relates to the budget, introduces consideration of statewide strategies as opposed to sanctioning silos; all while characterizing the state budget by articulating activities and results.

If this kind of approach sounds equally good, and yet unfamiliar; the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard agreed. They made this model a finalist in 2005 for its Innovation in Government Award. It will take a change in the balance of power for it to make a return to Washington, and I promise to be a strong voice to do just that.

My opponent's solution for stabilizing the budget is articulated on his website. It appears that he suggests that we can balance the budget by attacking me. With the sheer volume of misleading statements and negativity toward me coming out of his campaign, you would think he was making run at balancing the Federal Budget. Solutions are what voters want in this election, and Olympia. After all, we're all in this together. 

Thanks for reading.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sammamish-Issaquah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sorting through clothing at the warehouse
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Thank you so much for sharing this great event on Patch! What a cool thing to do--as an IssaquahRead More resident, I really appreciate your involvement with EBC.
Photo by Jean Johnson
Susan Gerend May 18, 2013 at 07:58 am
We too, love having our Farmers' Market return! Opening day was a bit weather-challenged. ThankRead More you merchants for enduring the wet and cold for our new extended hours! What a wonderful sight will return to the plaza when the sunshine calls back all the families with happy, giggling children. Market day is a date of dinner out (side) & shopping (vegetables, fruits and now HedgeHog Toffee) with my husband. Doesn't get much better than that! SEE YOUR THERE! Susan Gerend
Margaret Santjer (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Thanks for posting that, Jean! I love this time of year when the markets open. Were there a lot ofRead More people for the opening day?
David V May 15, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Thx Kendall, bear news just isn't what it used to be. thinking it has something to do with the komoRead More anchor moving out of our trossachs neighborhood:)
Kendall Watson (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Hey, thanks for the bear photos on Friday! Sorry about the slight delay in posting!
Ben H April 14, 2013 at 03:42 am
Agreed Mark, Much as this solution seems crazy, some things are worth paying for (law and order, aRead More decent safety net, good schools and yes roads). I do blame the tax hawks though. Washington already has a relatively regressive tax structure. The "choke the government" solution seems carried way too far.
Question Mark April 12, 2013 at 02:13 pm
I thank the author for his well thought out arguments regarding these important transportationRead More issues in Washington state. While I believe some of the ideas presented are debatable, for example I believe that a vital and well used transit system ought to be part of our congestion relief plan in metropolitan areas, the lack of realistic funding options for this system cannot be ignored. However, our legislature (both parties included) seems to place a higher priority on "no new taxes" than creating a sustainable future for the state in many areas, including the transportation system. More than that, though, we live in a state whose citizens have varied interests and priorities. Most of all, we need our government to set priorities so that citizen interests and needs can be reasonably served. It seems we are pretending that we can base tax policies and tax rates exclusively on individual self-interest, as is often the consequence "no new taxes" scheme (e.g. if I don't get a direct benefit for myself, I won't support paying for it). This seems to me to be as much a part of this problem as current transportation system priorities.
Richard Bray April 9, 2013 at 07:26 pm
It gets worse folks. I was part of a selected focus group a few weeks ago of people who live alongRead More I-405 conducted by a well-known marketing research firm and paid for by WSDOT. They are considering options that would charge commuters to use a new lane on I-405 & charge for the existing carpool lane too (even if you have two people in the car!)