.
Feedback

Sammamish Resident Faces Federal Child Pornography Charges

Brett J. Irving has been charged with three counts of possessing and distributing child pornography on the Internet, with some images depicting a child in diapers and with a plastic bag tied around her head.

A construction foreman who rented a room in a Sammamish man's home has been charged in federal court with three counts of possessing, receipt of and distributing child pornography.

Following an investigation dating back to March, King County Sheriff's detectives served a search warrant Sept. 18 on the home where Brett J. Irving, 58, rented a room. After discovering pornographic images on his computer, authorities arrested him at a construction job site in Kirkland where he was a foreman.

Irving was one of three men who rented rooms from a Sammamish man and his 11-year-old daughter, according to charging documents.

Irving allegedly admitted viewing the child pornography, and told investigators that he had masturbated into a pair of underwear belonging to his landlord's daughter. The home owner told police that Irving one day called him to ask if he could take his daughter for a bike ride, and he said no.

Irving acknowledged communicating online with persons he believed to be underage, but denied ever acting out his sexual fantasies, which he told police he "wanted to stop, but didn't know how," according to the charging documents.

The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force received a report from the Center for Missing and Exploited Children at the end of March that a Photobucket/Tinypic.com account had been used to upload child pornography depicting girls under the age of 9, including one with a child in diapers with a plastic bag tied around her head with a rope and her genitalia exposed; it was not clear if the child was dead or made to appear dead in the photo.

Emily Langlie, Public Affairs Officer for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle, said there are a number of reasons why a case may be moved to Federal Court, including the possibility of closer supervision on federal probation.

Distribution and receipt of child pornography is punishable by a mandatory minimum five years in prison, and a maximum penalty of 20 years. Possession of child pornography is punishable by a maximum of 10 years in prison.

Seattlepi.com reports that Irving was initially released on $10,000 bond, but later rearrested and is being held on $250,000 bond, and so far more than 300 videos and 155 images have been recovered from his computer.

Irving has a detention hearing Friday, Sept. 28, at 11 a.m.

Langlie said that law enforcement is still reviewing the videos and images seized from Irving's computer, though no local victims have been identified at this point. None of the other computers in the home were found to have any child pornography downloaded or viewed on them.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sammamish-Issaquah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sorting through clothing at the warehouse
Jeanne Gustafson (Editor) May 17, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Thank you so much for sharing this great event on Patch! What a cool thing to do--as an IssaquahRead More resident, I really appreciate your involvement with EBC.
Photo by Jean Johnson
Susan Gerend May 18, 2013 at 07:58 am
We too, love having our Farmers' Market return! Opening day was a bit weather-challenged. ThankRead More you merchants for enduring the wet and cold for our new extended hours! What a wonderful sight will return to the plaza when the sunshine calls back all the families with happy, giggling children. Market day is a date of dinner out (side) & shopping (vegetables, fruits and now HedgeHog Toffee) with my husband. Doesn't get much better than that! SEE YOUR THERE! Susan Gerend
Margaret Santjer (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Thanks for posting that, Jean! I love this time of year when the markets open. Were there a lot ofRead More people for the opening day?
David V May 15, 2013 at 02:49 pm
Thx Kendall, bear news just isn't what it used to be. thinking it has something to do with the komoRead More anchor moving out of our trossachs neighborhood:)
Kendall Watson (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Hey, thanks for the bear photos on Friday! Sorry about the slight delay in posting!
Ben H April 14, 2013 at 03:42 am
Agreed Mark, Much as this solution seems crazy, some things are worth paying for (law and order, aRead More decent safety net, good schools and yes roads). I do blame the tax hawks though. Washington already has a relatively regressive tax structure. The "choke the government" solution seems carried way too far.
Question Mark April 12, 2013 at 02:13 pm
I thank the author for his well thought out arguments regarding these important transportationRead More issues in Washington state. While I believe some of the ideas presented are debatable, for example I believe that a vital and well used transit system ought to be part of our congestion relief plan in metropolitan areas, the lack of realistic funding options for this system cannot be ignored. However, our legislature (both parties included) seems to place a higher priority on "no new taxes" than creating a sustainable future for the state in many areas, including the transportation system. More than that, though, we live in a state whose citizens have varied interests and priorities. Most of all, we need our government to set priorities so that citizen interests and needs can be reasonably served. It seems we are pretending that we can base tax policies and tax rates exclusively on individual self-interest, as is often the consequence "no new taxes" scheme (e.g. if I don't get a direct benefit for myself, I won't support paying for it). This seems to me to be as much a part of this problem as current transportation system priorities.
Richard Bray April 9, 2013 at 07:26 pm
It gets worse folks. I was part of a selected focus group a few weeks ago of people who live alongRead More I-405 conducted by a well-known marketing research firm and paid for by WSDOT. They are considering options that would charge commuters to use a new lane on I-405 & charge for the existing carpool lane too (even if you have two people in the car!)