.
Feedback

Budget Cuts Threaten to Ground Blue Angels Before Seafair

If Congress fails to pass a defense budget by March 1, the U.S. Navy may be forced to eliminate the popular traveling air show.

Budget gridlock in Congress could threaten this year's Seafair performance of the Blue Angels and potentially eliminate the entire U.S. Navy air show.

According to U.S. News & World Report, the upcoming sequestration deadline means the U.S. Navy could eliminate the popular air show program if Congress fails to reach consensus on a defense budget by March 1.

KIRO TV reports the Navy has confirmed the move would result in the cancelation of this summer's Seafair performance, scheduled for Aug. 2-4. But Seafair President Beth Knox said she is not in panic mode—yet.

"As we've seen in recent history, many adjustments are made prior to finalizing the budget, so until this occurs, it would be inappropriate to speculate potential cuts or the degree to which they happen," Knox told KIRO. "The Blue Angels are confirmed to fly at Seafair in 2013 and we remain confident the Seattle region will get to enjoy them this summer as they have for over 40 years.” 

Would you miss the Blue Angels? Tell us in the comments section.

Ron Wambolt February 1, 2013 at 01:38 am
This is what voting for Obama can bring. Not only no Blue Angels, but a greatly weakened military.
Pauline February 1, 2013 at 06:41 pm
OK, so let me get this straight: for the Obama-haters, it's all about cutting the deficit. But if something they ENJOY gets cut, then OMG, it's all Obama's fault. So cut Medicaid, cut funding for the arts, cut the education department, transportation department, regulatory agencies, but if my Blue Angels get taken away, boo hoo hoo.
Pat Kenmir (comment below) nailed it: in reality this is purely a PR tactic by the Navy to rile people up.
Caitlin Moran (Editor) February 1, 2013 at 06:55 pm
Two comments containing profanity have been removed from this stream. If you need a refresher on what is and is not allowed in Patch comments, please refer to our terms of service: http://redmond.patch.com/terms
BVorontsov February 1, 2013 at 10:42 pm
Who needs the Blue Angels. I think the Communist Chinese have a flight demonstration team that would be most welcome in Seattle.
Edward A. February 2, 2013 at 07:07 am
Ron, even if we halved military spending, it would dwarf the rest of the world's spending. We spend more on the military than the next 15 countries combined. I say, cut this silly blue angels stuff. If we can't afford health insurance for our working poor, we can't afford dazzling crowds at Seafair.
BVorontsov February 2, 2013 at 11:10 am
Low informational comments about halving the military is very telling. Those who don't see the value in a a strong, formidable US military either slept through their history classes or have contempt for America and want to see it destroyed. And as of late, the enemy within is winning.
Edward A. February 2, 2013 at 03:08 pm
No, having such a weak argument that you are forced to resort to thinly-veiled ad hominem (I either hate America, or don't know my history -- both quite false) is very telling.
I am going to break it down. The United States, in 2011, was responsible for 41% of the entire worlds's military spending. We spend as much on the military every year as the next 15 countries combined. Only two of those countries (Russia and China) could be considered enemies. I made you a table (based on data from SIPRI) to show you this: http://i.imgur.com/W74w8U0.png If we cut that figure of $711,000,000,000 in half, we would still be spending 1.65 times as much as our two "enemies," and combined with the rest of our allies in this list, 3.97 times as much as our "enemies" (Russia and China). At 4.7% of the entire economic output of the country, I think it is fair to ask whether we can afford this. So, how formidible do we have to be? Finally, for those who DID sleep through history class, I'd direct them to President Eisenhower's farewell address: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWiIYW_fBfY Remember while watching, Eisenhower was a Republican, clearly loved this country, and was a WWII military hero.
dexterjibs February 3, 2013 at 02:14 am
To answer the quastion, I would not miss the Blue Angels. However, I never went to watch them anyway cuz I am too busy. On a side note; Are there equal cuts to social programs so we don't have 45% of the population on food stamps? Are tehre equal cuts to adminstrative costs of running Washington DC?
BVorontsov February 3, 2013 at 03:50 am
Eduardo no need to be so defensive. And in case you haven't noticed, the world is a dangerous place.
Edward A. February 3, 2013 at 03:59 am
45% of the population isn't on food stamps. There, I fixed that for you. Now are you happy? :)
Yes, I realize you probably meant 45,000,000 people, not 45%, but it's hard to keep your facts straight sometimes. In all seriousness, did you realize many of those people have jobs? Source: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/09/03/food-stamps-public-policy-and-the-working-poor/. Those jobs don't pay enough for people to live on, yet the Republicans *always* oppose increases to the minimum wage, because they worry about the effect it will have on businesses. In other words, the government is subsidizing businesses by allowing them to keep wages low, and paying the "working poor" the difference with food stamps. If you want to decrease food stamp usage, increase the minimum wage, which has failed to keep pace with inflation. Source: http://www.raisetheminimumwage.com/facts/entry/amount-with-inflation/ Finally, as a former military contractor, I can tell you first-hand that if you want to see REAL waste of taxpayer dollars, look at military spending. Talk about fraud and corruption!
Edward A. February 3, 2013 at 05:30 am
It's an amusing pun to label me defensive when I am pointing out that my country spends more "defending itself" than almost the entire rest of the world combined. Was it intentional?
And, you are right -- the world is a dangerous place indeed. Did you know that we've killed hundreds of children in Pakistan *alone,* just through drone strikes? I'd rather spend my tax dollars feeding, clothing and educating people (you know, that old "hearts and minds" stuff) than killing them. I am pretty sure Jesus would agree.
Lily Lavish March 3, 2013 at 07:04 am
There are many reasons to be unhappy with our government and grounding the Blues will just be another! Even if they save money by cutting the defense budget they will just misappropriate our taxpayer's dollars in a much less enjoyable way! So I say bring on the Blues! We may as well get some bang for our buck instead of lining another shyster's pockets!!!!
Rouchard Duprie March 3, 2013 at 01:10 pm
L Squared, I like how you think.
R Jaffe March 3, 2013 at 01:16 pm
As a one of the dwindling lifers in the region, I would be sorry to see the Blues disappear as they represent part of the heritage and culture of this region for many of us. Yet, there are so many major defense projects that are unwanted by the Pentagon but which represent public spending insisted upon by corrupt politicians at the expense of tax payers. The Navy did not want the continuation of the contract for more Zumwalt class destroyers (DDG-1000) but they got a third ship anyway. Both Democrats and Republicans were jointly responsible for that one, an example of when both side can work together across the aisle against the best interests of the tax payer. (Sort of like our City Council here) The Air Force never wanted the new refueling tanker or a continuation of the problem ridden F-22. The Army did not want the continuation of the upgrade program for the M-1 Abrams. The bipartisan supported list of military spending on programs not wanted by the Pentagon goes on and on. The military budget could be cut by 20% without harming our military's capability, but it won't happen that way. Eliminating what amounts to military earmark spending is no more likely to happen then eliminating corporate entitlements that allow the biggest corporations to pay no taxes or cutting upper income entitlements such as low taxes on unearned income and nearly unlimited deductions on mortgage interest.
dexterjibs March 3, 2013 at 08:20 pm
I wonder how our parents and grandparents survived without all these silly government programs that empty headed liberals insist we need to pay for?
Joe M March 3, 2013 at 10:46 pm
You know liberals who are insisting we need to pay for the Blue Angels?
John Snow March 3, 2013 at 11:04 pm
You're right, they did survive. But not as long as they do now, and in much more poverty. And they lived in households with three and four generations under one crowded roof, because there was no way to finance what we consider dignified living.
John Snow March 3, 2013 at 11:07 pm
Edward A., don't forget to mention that Walmart, the biggest company in the world, relies on gullible taxpayers to provide health care for their employees, because as smart business people, the top brass at Walmart know how to squeeze the system to get the most for the stockholders, and the least for their employees.
John Snow March 3, 2013 at 11:14 pm
Ron, since 1990 our defense spending has tripled. Tripled. But you don't feel safer, do you? You just said our military is not just weakened, but greatly weakened. Clearly, money has not been the answer, so why are you complaining about cuts to a tiny public relations program? The Blue Angels serve no military purpose, flying outmoded non-combat aircraft in an attempt to attract new recruits.
Joseph March 4, 2013 at 01:48 am
Question...Why are we giving the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt 250 million dollars if we are cutting back programs to our own citizens here?...I don't get it...
Egyptians had more freedom before the Muslim B'hood took over that country... "U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt for President Mohammed Morsi's pledges of political and economic reforms by releasing $250 million in American aid to support the country's "future as a democracy."
Rouchard Duprie March 4, 2013 at 01:58 am
That's quite astounding. Do you feel the same way about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? I hope someone doesn't say the same thing about dated architects.
dexterjibs March 4, 2013 at 02:46 am
John Snow, that is some pretty lame argumentation. I will give you that people live longer, but that has more to do with medical advances and healthier choices than governmetn taxing and spending. What is really lame is the poverty argument. There has always been people living in poverty and will always be people living in poverty. Ever since the feckless war on poverty was started, the percentages of poverty have not changed. And multiple generations living under one roof? Have you seen the living arrangements of many Mexican families? Or are you talking about the college graduates of today that are forced to move back home. And these people get a lot of money from government programs. I recall people leaving home when they graduated high school and never coming back. We could go back to the spending levels of Bill CLinton and we would still survive.
Edward A. March 4, 2013 at 03:35 am
Human rights have nothing to do with aid to Egypt. If they had, we would have stopped giving it to them long ago. If you don't like it, look at real reasons: their proximity to Israel, and the Suez Canal. Here's a simple primer: http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/f.a.q.-on-u.s.-aid-to-egypt-where-does-the-money-go-who-decides-how-spent
Harborite March 4, 2013 at 11:46 am
The Blue Angels are fun to watch, but definately not something we need.
Brad H. March 4, 2013 at 01:16 pm
"We could go back to the spending levels of Bill CLinton and we would still survive."
-You mean the spending levels of Bill Clinton when he turned a federal deficit into a record surplus? Sounds good to me!
Lise Quinn March 4, 2013 at 04:27 pm
They didn't survive in the numbers people do now - that is why we started these programs. Maybe you should revisit your 20th century history.
This is stupid, they're just plane acrobatics. Not the defense of the country. They aren't dismantling them, their just not fueling them for an airshow. Big deal. Why should we be misappropriating our war machines for civilian entertainment.
Rouchard Duprie March 5, 2013 at 02:00 am
Simple, the administration has much admiration for the Muslim Brotherhood. And besides, what the government does with your tax dollars is none of your business as it really was never your money to begin with.
Edward A. March 5, 2013 at 02:13 pm
Regarding your first point, that is becoming a familiar "neocon" paranoid fantasy. This administration is not a fan of the Muslim Brotherhood, but they achieved power in democratic elections. That's the danger of democracy in the middle east - many people there want Muslim theocracy, just as many people here want Christian theocracy. Here, thankfully, they are a minority -- and our constitution forbids it.
Regarding your second point -- it is painful to watch your country's precious capital wasted, and that's how many of us felt as we watched almost a trillion dollars (most of it borrowed) get squandered in Iraq.
Rouchard Duprie March 5, 2013 at 02:50 pm
@Edward A. "Regarding your first point, that is becoming a familiar "neocon" paranoid fantasy."
Worse than fantasy is the cult like, messianic worship of a politician who has a narcissistic personality disorder.
Edward A. March 5, 2013 at 02:58 pm
I don't know if it's worse, but it is bad enough -- it is basically the other extreme. If you poke through my comments on this site, though, you'll see I am not in that category.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sammamish-Issaquah Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jenny Manning (Editor) June 11, 2013 at 10:32 am
Yikes! I had an encounter on Tiger Mountain with what I think was a cougar on June 9. We weren'tRead More close enough to see it (thank goodness) but could hear it, and what sounded like another animal dying/being eaten. This was about 3:30 p.m. a couple miles up the trail from Issaquah High School.
Bob McCoy June 12, 2013 at 07:39 am
Jenny Manning, this area lies on the WUI, Wildland-Urban Interface, and we have bears, cougars,Read More bobcats, and other of nature's fauna. Your comment indicates that you have not read my Patch blogs trying to dispel myths and fears of our local predators, and that you have little understanding of our biggest cat, the cougar. I would also venture that you have not availed yourself of the many outreach events held in this area regarding our wildlife. To state you had an "encounter" when you did not even have a 'sighting' is a misuse of clearly defined terminology for wildlife interactions. You might avail yourself of Western Wildlife Outreach's excellent materials regarding cougars and other apex carnivores in the Northwest: http://westernwildlife.org/cougar-outreach-project/cougar-safety/ To have heard "something" might well have been an animal being eaten, but to assume a cougar was having dinner, and the cougar was announcing it to the world, is a bit of a stretch. What, exactly, is the sound made by a cougar while killing a meal? As a stalk and pounce predator, mountain lions are silent in their approach. They efficiently kill, and unless taking down larger prey such as an elk, the prey's struggle is usually short, if any at all. Also, to make sounds while eating is to attract attention, and attention is what cougars avoid. Perhaps, though, you heard a cougar caterwauling? That is a call to attract a mate, one of the few times cougars do not want to avoid attention. Welcome to the Pacific Northwest. Your best way to be safe in our outdoors is to be knowledgeable about our wildlife, and to carry Bear Spray, pretty much in that order.
Jenny Manning (Editor) June 7, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Thanks for sharing this shot, David. How to you get to Duthie bike park? Looks like fun!
David V June 7, 2013 at 02:09 pm
Back side of the Samm Plateau near my Trossachs neighborhood. Folks come from all over to ride here.Read More http://www.kingcounty.gov/recreation/parks/trails/backcountry/duthiehill.aspx
David V June 7, 2013 at 02:11 pm
It'd be awesome if web links were automatically clickable on the patch. Wish list item:)
David V June 1, 2013 at 11:51 am
Thx Jenny! Definitely check out the Beaver Lake Tri in August on the Sammamish Plateau. A greatRead More tradition and a cool wooded setting for a hot August Tri:)
Kendall Watson (Editor) June 2, 2013 at 04:50 pm
Awesome! Thanks again for generously sharing your sharp photo skills on Sammamish-Issaquah Patch!
David V June 3, 2013 at 10:09 am
Always fun to post on the Patch. Keep up the great work you guys! Great local platform
Trevor in Autismland by Leslie Nan Moon
Jenny Manning (Editor) June 1, 2013 at 11:38 am
What a great idea for an exhibit. Would you be interested in partnering with us to make sure moreRead More people can see it once you've decided on which submissions you'll show? I think it'd be really neat to upload images of the artwork and the stories via our blogging platform. Please let me know if you're interested!
Anne Randall June 1, 2013 at 11:58 am
Absolutely, yes! I did a blog last year on the stories of the artists of the Sammamish Arts FairRead More (still in your archives, called Makers Among Us, under my name), and this would be a perfect way to refresh and continue the blog. I worked with Jeanne Gustafson to get started and she was most helpful. I will alert the curator of the show, and we'll plan on it. We would love to link to and from the artEAST website as well to get come viewers to share. If you have other suggestions, please let me know! Thanks, Anne Randall